Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The article is a summary of some of the pertinent literature on professionalism, highlighting the difference between how physicians understand professionalism and how other groups e.g. politicians, nurses and hospital managers might view the professionalism of doctors. It partly explains why surgeons have become increasingly 'managerialised' and lost autonomy since the 1970s. I speculate what might be the logical conclusion of this process if surgeons continue to be seen as technicians. The choice facing the surgical profession appears to be between retrenching, by this is meant resisting the challenges to traditional notions of professionalism, or reforming, i.e. to develop new workable models that better serve society and the profession. Some of this might make uncomfortable reading for physicians and surgeons; it is meant to.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04822.x

Type

Conference paper

Publication Date

2009-03-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

79

Pages

100 - 103

Total pages

3

Keywords

Humans, Altruism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, General Surgery, International Cooperation, Job Satisfaction, Models, Organizational, Physician's Role, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional Autonomy, Professional Competence, Professional Role, United Kingdom, Consensus Statements as Topic