Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for distal, medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) is not well established. This study investigates whether IVT impacts outcomes in DMVO patients, particularly in those with unsuccessful or partial recanalization after MT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Multicenter Analysis of primary Distal medium vessel occlusions: effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy (MAD-MT) registry. The study population included AIS patients with DMVO in the M2, M3, and M4 segments of the MCA, treated with or without IVT followed by MT and a final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0, 1, or 2a. The primary outcome was functional independence, assessed by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 or 0-2. RESULTS: The study comprised 210 patients with final mTICI 0 to 2a, with 130 undergoing MT alone and 80 receiving IVT followed by MT. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups. The odds ratios (ORs) for achieving a 90-day mRS of 0-1 and 0-2 were 1.55 (95% CI 0.62 to 3.87; p = 0.34) and 1.55 (95% CI 0.72 to 3.37; p = 0.26), respectively. The odds of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) were similar between groups (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.47; p = 0.29), as were the odds of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) of any type (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.73; p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: In AIS patients with DMVO and unsuccessful or partial recanalization after MT, IVT did not significantly improve clinical outcomes. Additionally, IVT did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications. These findings suggest that while IVT preceding MT is safe in this context, it may not improve outcomes for patients with unsuccessful MT.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s00062-025-01583-8

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-11-25T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

Acute Ischemic Stroke, Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion, Intravenous Thrombolysis, Mechanical Thrombectomy, Middle Cerebral Artery, Modified Rankin Scale