Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Since the Institute of Medicine's 1999 To Err is Human report, there has been a flurry of safety activity, including, but not limited to, improved voluntary safety reporting culture, standardization of safety practices, introduction of root cause analyses, safety event debriefs, and fortified institutional infrastructure to support safety work. These practices are used to examine failures and identify areas for improvement. Despite the significant prioritization of safety work, there is evidence to suggest that improvements have been minimal. The purpose of this commentary is to highlight three measurement deficiencies that have been largely overlooked but contribute significantly to the measurement challenge. In doing so, we aim to deepen our understanding of the many challenges we face as a safety community, enabling us to make more informed decisions about measurement going forward.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1177/25160435251384853

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

31

Pages

124 - 127

Total pages

3