Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Similarity in flow pulsatility has been proposed as a basis for semi-automated segmentation of vessel lumens for MR-based flow measurement, but re-examinations of salient aspects of the methodology have not been widely reported. METHODS: 12 normal control subjects underwent repeated (3*Baseline+1*5%CO2) phase contrast measurements of CSF flow through the cerebral aqueduct and foramen magnum, and CBF through the 6 large cranial vessels at the level of the 1st vertebra. Average flows were calculated for regions temporally correlated (0.3 < or = Rthreshold < or = 0.95) to user defined seed points and their 3 x 3 neighbours. RESULTS: Arterial CBF averaged 710ml/min, with low variability (+/- 4%/17%, intra-individual/group CV respectively) and was the only flow to respond significantly to 5%/mmHg CO2. Venous outflow was much smaller (298ml/min +/- 10%/ 72%), possibly due to the weak venous pulse and variable venous anatomy. Average CSF flows exceeded the classical 0.4ml/min CSF production rate and were highly variable--aqueduct: 0.6ml/min (+/- 50%/93%), foramen magnum: -2.7ml/min (+/- 158%/226%). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis identified procedural steps that can improve the accuracy and repeatability of MR flow measurements, but the process remains user-dependent for the weakly pulsatile foramen magnum CSF and venous flows where variability remains a significant confound even to relatively large perturbations such as CO2 administration.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Acta Neurochir Suppl

Publication Date

2008

Volume

102

Pages

263 - 270

Keywords

Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Vessels, Carbon Dioxide, Cerebral Aqueduct, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Foramen Magnum, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results