Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Stable complex coronary artery disease can be treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or medical therapy. Multidisciplinary decision-making has gained more emphasis over the recent years to select the most optimal treatment strategy for individual patients with stable complex coronary artery disease. However, the so-called 'Heart Team' concept has not been widely implemented. Yet, decision-making has shown to remain suboptimal; there is large variability in PCI-to-CABG ratios, which may predominantly be the consequence of physician-related factors that have raised concerns regarding overuse, underuse, and inappropriate selection of revascularization. In this review, we summarize these and additional data to support the statement that a multidisciplinary Heart Team consisting of at least a clinical/non-invasive cardiologist, interventional cardiologist, and cardiac surgeon, can together better analyse and interpret the available diagnostic evidence, put into context the clinical condition of the patient as well as consider individual preference and local expertise, and through shared decision-making with the patient can arrive at a most optimal joint treatment strategy recommendation for patients with stable complex coronary artery disease. In addition, other aspects of Heart Team decision-making are discussed: the organization and logistics, involvement of physicians, patients, and assisting personnel, the need for validation, and its limitations.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/eurheartj/eht059

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur Heart J

Publication Date

08/2013

Volume

34

Pages

2510 - 2518

Keywords

Appropriateness, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Guidelines, Heart Team, Multidisciplinary, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Revascularization, Shared decision-making, Underuse, Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Artery Disease, Decision Making, Humans, Myocardial Revascularization, Observer Variation, Patient Care Team, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Unnecessary Procedures