Safety and efficacy of different transplant kidney biopsy techniques: comparison of two different coaxial techniques and needle types.
Li D., Syriani DA., Gupta S., Hui J., Hanley J., Sayre J., Tse G., Hao F., Bahrami S., Felker E., Douek M., Lu D., McWilliams J., Raman S.
PURPOSE: Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy is essential for diagnosing medical renal disorders in transplant kidneys. A variety of techniques have been advocated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different coaxial techniques and biopsy devices. METHODS: This single-center dual-arm, observation study cohort included 1831 consecutive transplant kidney biopsies performed over a 68-month period. Two coaxial techniques were used, distinguished by whether the 17 gauge (G) coaxial needle was advanced into the renal cortex (intracapsular technique; IC) or to the edge of the cortex (extracapsular technique; EC). One of two needle types could be used with either technique: an 18G side-cutting (Bard Max-Core or Mission) or an 18G end-cutting (Biopince Ultra) needle. In all cases, the cortical tangential technique was used to reduce the risk of central artery transgression and unnecessary medullary sampling. Patients were monitored for 30 days post-procedurally and complications were evaluated using the SIR adverse event classification. RESULTS: Of the 1831 patients included in the study cohort, 13 suffered severe bleeding complications requiring operative intervention. Of these patients, 8 underwent biopsy with side-cutting needle and IC, 2 with side-cutting needle and approach not specified, 2 with end-cutting needle and IC, and 1 with end-cutting needle and EC. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of bleeding complications between different coaxial techniques and needle types. However, there was a significantly increased chance of inadequate sampling when comparing the side-cutting needle (1.0%) to the end-cutting needle (0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Transplant kidney biopsy performed with two different coaxial techniques and needle types did not show differences in bleeding complications. There is an increased risk of inadequate sampling when using side-cutting relative to end-cutting biopsy devices.