Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Various exercise thresholds have been evaluated to predict athlete performance. However, a systematic review of the literature assessing the association between lactate-based exercise thresholds and 2000 m rowing ergometer performance is still lacking. These may have utility in the prediction of 2000 m rowing ergometer performance due to the close relationship between metabolic parameters and development of endurance capacity. The aim of the present study is to review and assess the extent, quality, and reliability of lactate-based exercise testing and methodologies in their association with 2000 m rowing ergometer performance, and to discuss the potential implications for performance prediction. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The databases searched were EMBASE, MEDLINE and SPORTDiscus. The initial search took place in July 2022, with an update search performed in September 2023, and again in August 2024. Studies which reported a lactate test and its correlation to 2000 m ergometer performance were included. No meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies comprising 797 athletes (513 male, 257 female, 27 not stated) met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review. The most commonly used testing protocol involved the use of incremental step-tests. A range of exercise intensity parameters, lactate-based exercise thresholds and interpretation methodologies were employed. Of these, the power or velocity at a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol l-1 was the most common test, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.53 to 0.96 suggesting that 28-92% of the variance in rowing performance can be explained by this metric. Six studies that rated as GOOD on the risk of bias assessment found very strong correlations > 0.85 (p 

Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s40798-024-00796-4

Type

Journal article

Journal

Sports Med Open

Publication Date

28/02/2025

Volume

11

Keywords

Exercise testing, Exercise threshold, Lactate threshold anaerobic threshold, Physiological markers, Sports performance