Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion (CIBI) for spasticity of spinal and cerebral origin has been practised for over two decades. More recently, it has been used for severe spasticity of cerebral origin in children. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) appears most beneficial in severe spastic tetraparetics or tetraplegics, but the evaluation of the outcome of ITB and the benefit of the treatment are largely subjective. The evidence base for this treatment has been questioned, in particular for ambulant children, mainly because of the lack of objective outcome measures. Fifty-two spastic tetraparetic children have been treated by this method in Nottingham, from 1998 to 2003. This represents a large homogeneous series of CIBI in children with severe spasticity of cerebral origin. We carried out a prospective audit of our experience, morbidity and observations during that period. We identified that the lack of a suitable scoring system for the evaluation of effectiveness and benefit is a drawback. As a result of these observations a multicentre randomized controlled trial on ITB in tetraplegia-paresis and ambulant children is advocated.


Journal article


Br J Neurosurg

Publication Date





240 - 245


Adolescent, Baclofen, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, GABA Agonists, Humans, Infusion Pumps, Implantable, Injections, Spinal, Male, Morbidity, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome