Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

It is now half a century since the start of coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) with the first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following just over a decade later. The relative merits of PCI vs. CABG for stable coronary artery disease (stable-CAD) have continued to be debated ever since and have been the focus of around 20 randomized trials and numerous registry studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. The aim of this review is to identify areas of agreement, disagreement, and uncertainties in the role of PCI and CABG in patients with stable-CAD.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/eurheartj/ehw044

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur Heart J

Publication Date

21/06/2016

Volume

37

Pages

1873 - 1882

Keywords

CABG, Mammary artery, PCI, Stent, Surgery, Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome