Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Every medicine we take has been extensively trialled to prove it is safe and it works, but the same standards do not necessarily apply to medical devices like joint replacements, surgical mesh or pacemakers.

© IDEAL

Now, a group of researchers led by Oxford University and Weill Cornell Medicine have proposed a new framework to make sure that such devices get better scrutiny.

Writing in the June 9 issue of BMJ, the researchers compare the existing approaches to evaluation of medical devices in both the United States and the European Union — where manufacturers have to prove only that a device is safe to get approval to sell it — with an integrated evaluation pathway for demonstrating that devices are both safe and effective.

Regulators would get better, safer evidence faster while patients would get better, safer devices faster - Professor Peter McCulloch

'The current systems mean that a device is either unapproved – pre-market stage – or approved – post-market stage,' said Professor Peter McCulloch from the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences at Oxford University. 'Once approval is given, incentives for further study or evaluation become much weaker. Yet, with electronic or mechanical devices implanted in the body, long-term issues are possible and should be assessed.'

'An example is the failure of artificial metal-on-metal hip joints,' added Dr Art Sedrakyan, a professor of healthcare policy and research at Weill Cornell Medicine. 'Pre-clinical tests were enough to get these an approval by demonstrating technical performance, but were never likely to identify the issues of extensive wear, dislocations or pseudo-tumours as these devices were used by patients in the real world. That is why we are proposing a framework that tracks devices throughout the product life-cycle, from first design through long-term use.'

The two professors and their co-authors propose using a framework (IDEAL) developed initially for introducing new surgical techniques. IDEAL stands for Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long term study. Starting with the use of a new technique in just one patient, it can be used to build up evidence of how safe and effective the technique is as it is used by more surgeons with more patients.

Critical to the use of IDEAL for device regulation is the concept that, to get away from a yes-no system, regulators could gradually widen approval by linking it to participation in the appropriate IDEAL study type. This would encourage early stage clinical research, as well as support for registries of devices, allowing performance issues to be tracked. The writers say that this would make evaluation of new devices faster and better, allowing more learning from previous errors, and ultimately allowing products to be available sooner, with better scientific evidence.

'While medical devices need better regulation, wholesale adoption of the approval framework for medicines, including randomised controlled trials, is unlikely to be appropriate,' Dr Sedrakyan said. “The graduated approach of the IDEAL framework is better placed to support incremental improvements to existing devices.'

'Regulators would get better, safer evidence faster,' Professor McCulloch added, 'while patients would get better, safer devices faster, helping to improve health outcomes for a wide range of conditions.'

Similar stories

Using artificial intelligence (AI) for safer CT imaging of blood vessels

Congratulations to Dr Regent Lee at the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences (NDS) who has been awarded a grant of £246,226 from Heart Research UK for his research project ‘Using artificial intelligence (AI) for safer CT imaging of blood vessels’.

Developing new ways to assess kidneys so transplants last for longer

With funding from Kidney Research UK, a team of researchers from the University of Oxford, the University of Nottingham and University College London will develop ways to assess donor kidneys and predict how well they will work after transplant.

Potential for radiotherapy and VTP multimodality therapy for prostate cancer

A recent collaborative study from the University of Oxford has investigated the potential benefit of a combined therapy approach to prostate cancer treatment, using radiotherapy and vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP), which could lead to first-in-man early phase clinical trials.

Omair Shariq wins Best Clinical Paper at the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons 2021 Annual Meeting

Dr Omair Shariq, a DPhil student and clinical research fellow in the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences (NDS) and Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), has received the 2021 Best Presentation for Clinical Research award during the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES), which was held virtually on 25-27 April 2021.

Artificial intelligence tool for streamlining pathology workflow

A multidisciplinary team, comprising Andrea Chatrian, Dr Richard Colling, Professor Clare Verrill, Professor Jens Rittscher and colleagues, develops an algorithm for automated requesting of additional investigation in diagnostically uncertain prostate biopsies.

Latest issue of JNDS now online

The latest issue of the Journal of the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences (JNDS) is now available to read.

Blog posts

My virtual work experience with NDS and NDORMS

Louise Tan, a Year 12 student from Ballyclare in County Antrim, Northern Ireland, recently attended the joint NDS and NDORMS Virtual Work Experience. In this guest blog, Louise reflects on her experience.

Celebrating women of NDS

To celebrate 100 years since women were admitted as full members of the University and on the occasion of International Women's Day, a group of inspirational women in the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences (NDS) reflect on their journeys, their place in Medical Sciences and their vision for the next 100 years.

The life of a research nurse: supporting the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Trial

Research nurses in the NHS are playing a crucial role in helping to trial new coronavirus treatments and vaccines. Three NDS research nurses stepped up to help with the fight against this new disease. Here Bhumika Patel shares her experience of working on the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Trial.

Why I became a Peer Supporter

The Peer Support Programme was developed in recognition of the essential role students play in supporting and encouraging one another on a day-to-day basis throughout their time at university. NDS’ own Helen Stark discusses her experience of becoming a Peer Supporter.

Racism under the microscope

As Black History Month gets underway in the UK, NDS Athena SWAN Coordinator Emily Hotine puts racism under the microscope.